WHEN
DID KIDS AND NATURE
QUIT BEING FRIENDS?
One Man’s Perspective and
Mission to Change That Situation
By Jack Etzel
Richard Louv is the author of seven books about family,
nature and community. His latest book titled Last Child in the Woods:
Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder has created a
national conversation about the disconnection between children and
nature, its implications for human health, and the future of the
environment. Among many organizations, he is Chairman of the Children
& Nature Network (www.cnaturenet.org) and an advisor to the National
Scientific Council on the Developing Child. North Hills Monthly
Magazine: What’s the difference about how children play today compared
to 20 years ago? Richard Louv: Members of my generation grew into
adulthood taking nature’s childhood gifts for granted; we assumed
(when we thought of it at all) that generations to come would also
receive these blessings. But, now we know that something has changed.
Over the past 15 years, I have interviewed families across the country
about the changes in their lives, including their relationships with
nature. With few exceptions, even in rural areas, parents say the same
thing: Most children aren’t playing outside anymore, not in the woods
or the fields or the canyons.
Today, kids are well aware of the global threats to the
environment, but their physical contact, their intimacy with nature on
a day-to-day basis, is fading. A fifth-grader in a San Diego classroom
put it succinctly: “I like to play indoors better ‘cause that’s where
all the electrical outlets are.” NHMM: You indicated that some
barriers of our litigious society should be lowered. Why? Louv: We
need to begin to think in terms of comparative risk. Yes, there’s risk
in nature, but there is also a huge risk to children's health- think
of the relationship between child obesity and diabetes and heart
disease - by raising future generations under virtual house arrest.
The litigious society is part of the problem. You can see a “DON’T
RUN” sign on a playground! Medical Insurance reform is also
essential, but reducing the number of tragedies in the first place
remains the most important goal. In 2004, the nonprofit Institute for
Healthcare Improvement launched the 100,000 Lives Campaign, a broad
national effort to reduce lawsuits by improving medical services,
identifying six basic measures that could save as many as 100,000
lives a year- if even 2,000 hospitals adopted them. That's a step in
the right direction.
But, the hardest task will be to create a more predictable process,
one that balances the individual case with the public need for
acceptable risk that more clearly sets the parameters of acceptable
risk, in the public mind. NHMM: You make a link between outdoor
activity and good mental and physical health, writing that nature can
be what you called a “healing balm” in a child’s life. Louv: The
evidence that connects nature to well-being and restoration has
focused on adults, but during the past decade, scientists have begun
to study the impact of nearby nature on child development.
Environmental psychologists reported in 2003 that that nature in or
around the home, or simply a room with a view of a natural landscape,
helped protect the psychological well-being of the children.
Researchers have found that children with disabilities gain enhanced
body image and positive behavior changes through direct interaction
with nature. Studies of outdoor-education programs geared toward
troubled youth, especially those diagnosed with mental health
problems, show a clear therapeutic value. Some of the most intriguing
studies are being done by the Human-Environment Research Laboratory at
the University of Illinois, where researchers have discovered that
children as young as five showed a significant reduction in the
symptoms of Attention-Deficit Disorder when they engaged with nature.
Could nature therapy be a new option for ADD treatment? Meanwhile,
the California-based State Education and Environmental Roundtable, a
national effort to study environment-based education, found that
schools that use outdoor classrooms, among other techniques, produce
student gains in social studies, science, language arts and math;
improved standardized test scores and grade-point averages; and
enhanced skills in problem-solving, critical thinking, and
decision-making. In addition, anecdotal evidence suggests that time in
natural surroundings stimulates children’s creativity. NHMM: Your
book is packed with well-researched critical thinking, but you remain
optimistic, writing that, “Good works are taking root.” Louv:
Environmental educators, conservationists, and others have worked for
decades to bring more children to nature- usually with inadequate
support from policymakers. But, now a number of trends, including the
recent unexpected national media attention to Last Child and “nature
deficit disorder,” have gained a broader audience. We do seem to
have reached a tipping point. Stories about the children and nature
movement have appeared recently in many national newspapers and
magazines. State and regional campaigns have begun to form in many
cities. A host of related initiatives, among them the simple-living,
walkable cities, nature-education, and land-trust movements, have
begun to find common cause and collective strength through this issue.
It has attracted a wide assortment of people. Also, some of us have
formed the Children & Nature Network (www.cnaturenet.org) to chronicle
and encourage this movement.
Recently, I was asked to give testimony to a congressional
subcommittee. After I finished, the six members of congress began to
reminisce about their own childhood experiences in nature, and how
they would never want that opportunity to end for future generations.
In those moments, there were no Republicans in the room and there were
no Democrats.
|